Home > Issues > Irrationality > The Genetics of Feminist Cavemen

The Black Ribbon Campaign

Empowering Men:

fighting feminist lies


The Genetics of Feminist Cavemen

© Peter Zohrab 2006

Home Page Articles about Issues 1000 links
alt.mens-rights FAQ Sex, Lies & Feminism Quotations
Male-Friendly Lawyers, Psychologists & Paralegals Email us ! Site-map


The article "Cavemen Preferred Blondes", reprinted from The Times, appeared in Wellington's Dominion Post on 4th March 2006. Written by Roger Dobson and Abul Taher, it suggested that all human hair-colours and eye-colours other than dark brown arose in Northern Europe because many men died hunting, and women who had varied colours in their hair and eyes competed more successfully for scarce men. After the Ice Age -- the theory goes -- the only food fit for humans in Northern Europe was the animals that grazed on the only vegetation around -- grass. So hunting was the only way to get food, and therefore men were indispensible to women as hunters. In other parts of the world, there was more edible vegetation around for humans to eat.

That leads me to speculate about the selection pressures on men in that environment. The men who survived would presumably all have been able to get a female to mate with (unless polygamy was practised), but hunting would have created its own selective pressures. The types of men who tended to die when hunting (if this event was not random) would not have many descendants, and the groups whose men were not good hunters might have died out altogether.

It may be that cavemen hunted in teams, especially when hunting big game such as mammoths. If this was the case, the groups who survived and left the most descendants might have been those whose menfolk were not scared to sacrifice themselves for the good of the group as a whole. In such groups, the bravest men would have left the most descendants, because the best-looking (blonde or readheaded) women* would have favoured them. Initially, that would have made little difference, because even the cowardly men would have been able to get a woman. But the female children of a cowardly man and an unattractive woman would have had difficulty getting a man to mate with and produce descendants in the next generation down, because they would have been likely to have been unattractive, too.

If many men also died protecting their womenfolk and children from man-eating predators that invaded their caves, that would also have favoured the survival of groups that selected for bravery and chivalry in men.

This may explain why chivalry and Feminism have flourished more in Northern Europe (and places colonised by Northern Europeans) than in other parts of the world. Feminism is intrinsically irrational, because it gives the special privilege of victim status to women -- without bothering to first compare all the disadvantages suffered by men with those suffered by women. This irrational theory needs the menfolk to be chivalrous for it to be accepted -- otherwise it would not be taken seriously. Some specific aspects of Feminist irrationality can be found in articles listed on the page isirrati.html.


* It would be interesting to compare the apparent attractiveness of new and different haircolours in prehistoric times with the way fashions change so frequently nowadays.




Peter Douglas Zohrab

Latest Update

26 July 2015