The Men's Movement has reacted defensively
to the actions of mass-murderer Marc Lepine - concentrating on pointing out
that most men are not like him. That is a fair point, but the act of stating
it is just a reaction to the lying Feminist propaganda which called him a
misogynist - a woman-hater.
I bet you don't know he wasn't a misogynist - because you have been conned
by the media (as usual). In fact, he was a Men's Rights activist (albeit an
extremist one), and one of the things he was protesting about was media censorship
- and the way the media censored the facts surrounding his action retrospectively
justifies some sort of protest action by him, at least !
I don't know, of course, if it is genuine or whether it has been altered
in any way, but it rings true to me.
In the note, from which it is clear that he is against Feminists -- not
against women -- he clearly states that he is protesting against various issues
which are aspects of Feminist sexism. Here are his points, in my words, together
with my comments:
1. They want to retain the advantages of being women while trying to grab
those of the men. COMMENT: That is a very serious and valid issue, especially
as Feminism is taught as God's Truth in education systems and propounded as
God's Truth by the United Nations, governments, and the mass media. Has the
media covering Marc Lepine dealt with those issues ? Of course not -- the
media are not the solution, but the problem.
2. Sexism in the Olympic Games (he could have mentioned professional and
amateur sports in general), where men and women compete in separate competitions
for the simple reason that it suits women for that to happen. COMMENT: If
something suits women, it happens. If something suits men, it's banned on
the grounds of "Gender Equity".
3. Feminists always try to misrepresent men every time they can. COMMENT:
Since Feminists virtually control information in western societies, that is
a serious issue. His statement may be a slight exaggeration, but has the media
dealt with it ? Of course not -- they have been too busy misrepresenting Marc
4. Military sexism. COMMENT: Feminists have the vote, are a majority of
the electorate, vote in governments that declare war, only the men are conscripted,
and after the war the Feminists reinvent history by insisting that women made
an equal contribution to the war effort. Women may serve in the military as
volunteers (i.e. if they happen to want to), but no modern country has ever
drafted them to serve in the front-line (i.e. over-riding their wishes) on
the same basis as men.
The write-ups on Marc Lepine concentrate on character-assassination. They
take things out of context, in the same way that fathers are slandered in
the divorce/family court, in order to deprive them of custody or access. I
could go through the slanders one-by-one, but one example will have to do,
The Montreal Gazette (January 16, 1990) reports that Marc Lepine's former
roommate, Erik Cossette, claimed that Lepine made "sexist remarks" about women.
Eventually, the article does give some evidence for this claim: It states
that Cossette claims that Mark Lepine thought that women didn't have the strength
to be police officers.
Is that a "sexist remark" ? If you say that women don't have the strength
to compete in the men's section of a weightlifting competition, is that also
a sexist remark ? It is obviously a true remark, but is it a "sexist" remark
? How would you know ? I guess you'd have to go and ask a Feminist, because
it seems to me that, in practice, a "sexist" remark is one that a Feminist
doesn't like ! I have been working to change that - see my book, "Sex,
Lies & Feminism".
In my opinion, what is sexist here is the fact that we have a separate
men's and women's sections in weightlifting competitions, and that men can't
get into police forces if they only meet the physical standards that allow
women to become police officers ! I wrote and asked the Montreal Police if
they operated this sexist recruitment policy, but they evaded my question.
So Marc Lepine was not only not sexist, as the media stated - he was actually
fighting sexism !
"Forgive the mistakes, I only had 15 minutes to write this.
See also Annex.
Please note that if I am committing suicide today 89/12/06 it is not for
economic reasons (for I have waited until I exhausted all my financial means,
even refusing jobs) but for political reasons. For I have decided to send
Ad Patres the feminists who have ruined my life. It has been seven years that
life does not bring me any joy and being totally blase, I have decided to
put an end to those viragos.
I had already tried as a youth to enlist in the Forces as an officer cadet,
which would have allowed me to enter the arsenal and precede Lortie in a rampage.
They refused me because of asociality. So I waited until this day to carry
out all my projects. In between, I continued my studies in a haphazard way
for they never really interested me, knowing in advance my fate. Which did
not prevent me from obtaining very good marks despite not handing in my theory
assignments and studying little before exams.
Even though the Mad Killer epithet will be attributed to me by the media,
I consider myself a rational and erudite person that only the arrival of the
Grim Reaper has forced to undertake extreme acts. For why persevere in existing
if it is only to please the government? Being rather retrograde by nature
(except for science), the feminists always have a talent for enraging me.
They want to retain the advantages of being women (e.g. cheaper insurance,
extended maternity leave preceded by a preventive leave) while trying to grab
those of the men.
Thus, it is self-evident that if the Olympic Games removed the Men/Women
distinction, there would be only be women in the graceful events. So the feminists
are not fighting to remove that barrier. They are so opportunistic that they
neglect to profit from the knowledge accumulated by men throughout the ages.
They always try to misrepresent them every time they can. Thus, the other
day, people were honoring the Canadian men and women who fought at the frontlines
during the world wars. How does this sit with the fact that women were not
authorized to go to the frontline at the time??? Will we hear of Caesar's
female legions and female galley slaves who of course took up 50 per cent
of history's ranks, although they never existed? A real Casus Belli.
Sorry for this too brief letter."
(This was followed by a 19-name hit list of various Quebec women having
achieved some advances in traditionally male professions: accountancy, journalism,
labor organizing, sportscasting, firefighting, police work, etc., with the
following note at the bottom:)
"Nearly died today. The lack of time (because I started too late) has allowed
those radical feminists to survive."
Alea Jacta est."
Feminists control information. They are hypocritical, they lie, they tell
half-truths, they distort truth. Democracy depends on the information that
is available to voters and politicians. If this information is controlled
by self-serving Feminist liars, Democracy is a sham, and the Marc Lepine way
may become the way of the future. We've seen suicide bombing in Israel and
on September 11, 2001 in the USA -- will other men/fathers take up this extremist