Home > Issues > the Law > The Media University Complex and the Constitution

The Black Ribbon Campaign

Empowering Men:

fighting feminist lies


The Media University Complex and the Constitution

Copyright: Peter Zohrab 2003

Home Page Articles about Issues 1000 links
alt.mens-rights FAQ Sex, Lies & Feminism Quotations
Male-Friendly Lawyers, Psychologists & Paralegals Email us ! Site-map


Leaving aside the issue of whether the UK government's attack on the BBC
(See: http://www.canoe.ca/WinnipegNews/ws.ws-06-30-0036.html ) is a classic counterattack
to divert attention from the real issues, I want to make the case that the media, in modern Western
countries, must be seen as a constitutionally important part of Government. Why else would a
conflict between the Executive and the media itself be headline news ?

Though the media are sometimes casually referred to as the Fourth Estate, the Government is usually
regarded as being composed of (1) the Executive (Queen/President/Prime Minister, etc.), (2) the
Legislature (Parliament/Congress, etc.) and (3) the Judiciary (the Courts). In a democracy, those
three institutions are very dependent on the media for their communication with the electorate, and we,
the electorate, are dependent on the media for our knowledge of what these three institutions are up
to, or should be up to. In addition, the education sector teaches us values and supposed "facts"
which influence us throughout our lives, in our thinking and in our voting behaviour.

The media is editorially controlled by a class of people whose views are fairly uniform and
predicatable -- as the Men's Movement knows to its cost. The same can be said about the education
system. Neither of these is democratically controlled -- they are both oligarchies. The media like
to point to their owners as a source of bias, but that is a red herring, since there is little
evidence that the owners of the media generally interfere in the actual content of the media. The
education sector has little or no inhibitions or ethical restrictions on pushing (usually Leftist)
propaganda down our throats, and the throats of our children. Academics often use the sophisticated
ploy that there is no such thing as "truth" anyway, so how could we be so naive as to insist that
they stick to it ? And when you catch academic Feminists (who use the education system as a Rotten
Borough) telling lies or being illogical, they reply that rationality is a male characteristic, and
we need to free ourselves from the Patriarchal domination of rational thought !

Although we now have the internet as an alternative source of information, the media and education
system are still very powerful oligarchies. By sending out the same (biased) message on a
particular issue to millions or billions of people, these institutions can achieve "critical
mass" -- they can get lies and half-truths (e.g. on Sex War issues) accepted as part of the
background asumptions (ideology) of Western (and other) societies. The Judiciary (apart from the
Public Service) is the only unelected part of the tripartite Government, as conventionally analysed.
However, whenever you get judges making judgements on (so-called) "policy", or when judges decide to
be "activist" and depart from legal tradition, they are often doing little more than parroting the
message that has been dished out to them by the media and/or education system.

So I think it is high time for Constitutional Lawyers and Political Scientists to acknowledge
formally and publicly that the Fourth Estate (the media) and the Fifth Estate (the education system)
are just as much part of the Constitution as are the Executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary.
Only once they are recognised for what they are can we begin to discuss how they should be
structured, balanced, and -- yes ! -- controlled by democratic accountability.




Peter Douglas Zohrab

Latest Update

27 July 2015