One finds in feminists a desire to control information -- which they can
can contemplate doing, because the media are also full of feminists (See:
boycecnt.html). Micheline Carrier wrote, in connection
with my article on Marc Lepine:
<<Je me suis demandée un moment s'il convenait de rapporter de tels
propos au risque de leur donner une publicité indue.>> (My translation:
"I wondered for a moment if it was appropriate to report writing of this
sort, at the risk of giving it undue publicity.")
<<I don't believe it is dangerous to have a window inside (this man's)
head.>> (Who came up with the notion that a man's ideas might be dangerous
? What's happened to freedom of speech ?)
Moreover, that page informs us that the Police haven't officially released
that letter. Not only are the media feminist, but the Police are also feminist,
and wanted to protect us from the truth !
This matriarchal attitude present in our Western feminist establishment
shows up also when she writes:
<<Tiens, tiens, le lobby des pères montre le bout du nez.>>
(My translation: "Well, well ! The Fathers' Lobby is showing the tip
of its nose !")
Obviously, the rights, wishes and demands of men and fathers should -- according
to Micheline Carrier -- remain buried under the day-to-day censorship of the
feminist media !
Micheline Carrier thinks that I suffer from "blind hatred" and
that my article is "nearly delirious". But she doesn't say a single
word about the six articles of the manifesto contained in Marc's letter, about
the injustice under which men are forced to live in feminist societies, about
the suffering of fathers and children in societies where divorce is described
as a great victory for women, about the loss to Quebec society of young lives
which will be deprived of their fathers and thereby wounded to the heart,
without counting the children who have been aborted without their fathers'
permission -- or their own permission, of course -- and the deaths and serious
wounds suffered by so many men who, in several wars, survived only to be oppressed
by the feminist state.
The only "blind hatred" is the hatred that feminists like Micheline
Carrier feel towards men, since she only mentions crimes committed by men.
They refuse to contemplate the academic statistics such as those you can find
at page http://www.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm
, which clearly show that women's violence against men exceeds men's violence
Micheline Carrier writes:
<<Et le «lobby des pères» minimise la violence en milieu familial
et, écartant les données fiables, prétend que la violence des femmes à l'égard
des hommes équivaut et dépasse même celle des hommes envers les femmes.>>
(My translation: "And the "fathers' lobby" makes light of family
violence and, brushing aside reliable data, claims that women's violence against
men equals or even surpasses that of men against women.")
That is a heap of lies which, all by itself, after being repeated several
times by the feminist media, the feminist Police, feminist governments, and
by feminist universities, would perhaps provide justification for a full-scale
revolution -- not for a little extremist protest by a Marc Lepine all by himself
We don't "make light of" violence -- we only say that women,
too, are violent. It's feminists like Micheline Carrier, who, blinded
by hatred, make light of women's violence.
We don't brush aside reliable data. I'd very much like to see a definition
of "reliable data" which could exclude the data at the page
Needless to say, Micheline Carrier herself doesn't cite any reliable data.
All that she was able to cite in the way of statistics in her article
<<Des hommes «en tant qu'hommes», comme le dit Martin Dufresne,
ont commis 679 meurtres sur des femmes et des enfants depuis décembre
1989. >> (My translation: "Men 'in their capacity as men',
as Martin Dufresne puts it, have committed 679 murders of women and children
She doesn't cite any figures about murders by women of men and children
-- nor about abortions.
Murders should not be confused with family violence. As is shown at the
women's violence towards men is equal to and even exceeds that of men towards
women. However, feminist propaganda and the self-styled "justice"
system practically restricts itself to arresting men when there's a family
conflict. In practice, the Police exist only for women. Deprived of a police
force to come to their aid against a violent woman, and of courts which are
likely to take an interest in fathers' emotions in divorce cases, men are
forced to flee or to fight. One of these choices could result in suicide,
and the other in murder. The blind hatred of the feminists towards men results
in a government policy of blind hatred towards men, with results which the
feminists make use of subsequently to reinforce the policy of hatred towards
men -- by confusing voilence with the murders which are the result of this
government policy of blind ideological hatred, which has a lesbian psychological
origin, towards men.
Marc Lepine wanted to rehabilitate men. He
wanted the media to free themselves -- however slightly -- from their preoccupation
with "equality for women", in order to concentrate
somewhat on "equality for men". He failed. What do we have to do
in order to succeed ?
New Zealand Equality Education Foundation