|
(Open Letter to the Leader of the Act Party)
Dear Mr. Seymour,
Brainwashed by their Feminist State Ideology,
politicians of New Zealand, Australia and the United States are unable
to see their hands in front of their faces! They have evidence
of female violence in front of their eyes, but they insist on seeing
only the male violence which their Feminist State Ideology keeps banging
on about.
-
In the USA, former Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy
Pelosi dislikes violence against women, because she prefers violence
against men. She has stated, : "For a quarter
century, the Violence Against Women Act has stood as a landmark
achievement in the fight to eradicate the scourge of sexual assault
and domestic violence. Every woman
has the right to live free from fear, intimidation and violence,
and over the last 25 years, this transformative, bipartisan legislation
has delivered extraordinary progress to achieve this critical mission."
However, Pelosi herself, according to video
footage reported in Vanity Fair, once wanted to sock Trump in
the mouth. There is no Violence Against Men Act, so
I suppose she would be allowed to do that to Trump, or any other
man -- without penalty. In addition, Hilary
Clinton has been accused of assaulting Bill Clinton, when he
was President.
-
In Australia, the webpage https://www.bettinaarndt.com.au/winning-over-young-men/
published a photograph of a rally of women protesting violence against
women. However, as the photo showed, the women had pasted
a sign saying "Kick me" onto the pants of Prime Minister
Albanese, who was addressing the rally. I suppose that, in
the Australian Matriarchy, women are allowed to kick men with impunity.
-
In New Zealand, we have a Ministry for the Prevention of Family
and Sexual Violence, which was founded by the Lesbian
former Green Party MP, Jan Logie, who is on record as implying
that men have no Human Rights. There is no sane reason to
lump together family violence and sexual violence. How
about having a Minister for the Prevention of Shoplifting, Benefit
Fraud and Worker Exploitation instead? That would not
please Green Party Members of Parliament, of course, because three
former Green MPs or their spouses have admitted, or been accused
of, involvement in such crimes. The only reason Parliament
would lump together family violence and sexual violence would be
if they assumed that men are the perpetrators of both of these crimes
and Parliament just wanted to attack men. Female Green MP,
Julie
Anne Genter recently bullied a male MP in Parliament's debating
chamber. I bet no male MP has ever done anything similar to
a female MP. I note that the Crimes Act stipulates a higher
penalty for an assault on a female than for an assault on a male.
This proves that Parliament hates men, encourages
violence against men and does not believe in Gender Equality or
Human Rights. Members of Parliament prefer man-hating
Feminist doctrine over the evidence of their own eyes. The
former Act MP, David Garrett, also testified in Parliament (Hansard,
December 2008) about how his mother abused his father. In addition,
since no one in Wellington knows anything about family violence
or sexual violence -- apart from desiring to blame men for it --
they have absolutely no chance of preventing it.
Focussing on male violence against women -- for no rational reason
whatsoever -- allows women to get away with violence against men, because
men will not report it and the police and courts will tend not to take
it seriously. Even in India, women are allowed to get away with
violence against men on live television -- as you can see from this
video: https://www.facebook.com/peter.zohrab/posts/2382196748740294?notif_id=1588098898804307¬if_t=feedback_reaction_generic&ref=notif
, where a woman slapped a man, and -- when he hit her back -- he was
beaten up by a mob of men.
Family Violence
describes 343 scholarly investigations (270 empirical studies
and 73 reviews) demonstrating that women are as physically aggressive
as men (or more) in their relationships with their spouses or opposite-sex
partners. The aggregate sample size in the reviewed studies exceeds
440,850 people.
This bibliography includes New Zealand research.
Sexual Violence
Although I am sure that the Minister for the Prevention of Family
and Sexual Violence and her staff assume that all sexual violence is
perpetrated by men, I refer you to the following academic articles:
-
Krahé, Barbara, Scheinberger-Olwig, Renate, and Bieneck,
Steffen: Men's Reports of Nonconsensual Sexual Interactions With
Women: Prevalence and Impact, Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol.
32, No 2, April 2003, pp 165-175.
-
Krahé, Barbara, Waizenhöfer, Eva, and Möller,
Ingrid: Women's Sexual Aggression Against Men: Prevalence and
Predictors, Sex Roles, Vol. 49, Nos 5/6, September 2003.
I myself have several times been the victim of female sexual violence
and other female violence.
Conclusion
Karen Chhour, the Minister for the Prevention of Family and Sexual
Violence, appears to have the brain of an intellectually handicapped
fruit-fly -- together with huge emotions (like
most women). She admits
being emotional. I have seen her on television wearing the
sexist White Ribbon, which emphasises violence against women and ignores
violence against men. Lesbian Radio (Radio New Zealand) has stated
that her Ministry will have a special section for men. It is clear
that your Government just wants to bash men. New Zealand, Australia,
the USA (and India) deserve politicians who have minds, and are capable
of looking at facts. If females continue
to impose their
emotions and anxieties onto the objective facts, they should be
sent back to the kitchen and denied the vote!
END THE OPPRESSION OF MEN BY SEXIST WOMEN!
|
