Home > Issues > Fake News > Leftists Using Cameras to Tell Lies

The Black Ribbon Campaign

Empowering Men:

fighting feminist lies

Leftists Using Cameras to Tell Lies

Peter Zohrab 2017

Home Page Articles about Issues 1000 links
alt.mens-rights FAQ Sex, Lies & Feminism Quotations
Male-Friendly Lawyers, Psychologists & Paralegals Email us ! Site-map

As many people are aware, the news media are biased as regards what topics they choose to cover, how they choose to cover them and whose views they allow their viewers/listeners/readers to know about. For examples of this phenomenon, see the following pages:

However, it is important to realise, also, that the media use cameras to tell lies, as well as directly telling lies in verbal or written language. Here are some examples of how this is done:

  1. When Don Brash was prominent in right-wing New Zealand politics, the single most common photograph of him that I saw on television was one where he had unpleasant expression on his face. It appeared that he was looking at a group of journalists. One or more of them had presumably decided to do something to provoke him, so that they could then snap an unflattering photograph of him to show to the public. Irrespective of how this photograph had come about, the fact that television kept showing this shot of him was proof of media bias and of the usual media determination to pervert the democratic process.

  2. I have been interviewed by the media a few times, although I have never been allowed by them to debate Feminism or Men's Rights with Feminists in a live broadcast.1 One time I was interviewed for a TVNZ current affairs programme and the female interviewer and I were sitting on chairs a couple of metres apart, facing each other. During the interview, the woman was leaning forward and staring fixedly into my eyes. This stare, combined with the fact that I was saying things that I knew that she, as a Feminist, would disagree with, caused me to close my eyes -- at least some of the time. This, of course, would have conveyed a negative impression of me to the average viewer. After I had written and published (on the Web) the article The Treaty of Waitangi has no Principles, in which I had criticised him, Court of Appeal President Cooke (later Lord Cooke of Thorndon), was interviewed on (as I recall) a news programme and he did the interview with his eyes shut! Apparently I was the only person who had criticised his judgment with cogent arguments up till that time.

  3. On 13th October 2017, walking through Wellington, New Zealand, I was subjected to racial harassment from Samoan males installing fibre broadband for the company Chorus under the footpaths. Later, one young Black female sneered at me when I looked at her, and smiled happily when I spat on the ground in response. I noticed some rapid movement behind the tinted windscreen of a car parked just next to us, although I couldn't see what was happening there, because of the tinted glass. Later on, I came across a young Black male wearing a hoody, behaving quite normally. But behind him was a young White woman, who had been hiding behind him, camera poised, and ready to take my photo if I reacted negatively to this inoffensive Black man. She had a huge grin on her face. It is obvious to me that there had earlier been someone (probably the same woman) in the car, taking my photo when I reacted to being sneered at by the Black woman!

I am often subjected to psychological pressure when in public. The reason for this is that my sort of views are systematically censored and actively campaigned about by the Fake News Media and the Fake Education Sysytem. That makes my views appear to be "extreme" and rare and allows me to be targetted in conspiracies. In fact, I think that the reason why the Court of Appeal reached the decision referred to above is ultimately because of this kind of pseudo-moral pressure being exerted upon judges, politicians etc., so that they end up making decisons on the basis of nothing more than an internalised maxim such as "Duh! Women good, Maoris good; men bad, Whites bad!" Since I have been threatened, I expect that judges and other prominent people have been threatened by Leftists as well, so that the combination of threats, pseudo-moral pressure and the implied promise of honours causes such people to make the right -- i.e. the Left -- decisions.

 

1.The then Nine-to-Noon radio show presenter, Kim Hill, was a partial exception, since she is a Feminist herself and debated with me live on air. However, that was a mistake on her part, since she only interviewed me because she thought she could slaughter me in any debate on Feminism. She had heard that I was the Secretary of the New Zealand Men for Equal Rights Association, so she told me (sarcastically) that she thought that Feminism was about equality. I said that it wasn't -- it was only about selective equality, with Feminists determining which issues to apply "equality" to and how to define "equality" with respect to those issues. She did not have any answer to that, but she has not ceased to call herself a Feminist, as far as I am aware! That would involve honesty and integrity on her part, which are totally out of the question!

Summary Haiku:

Men have no rights,
but aren't less human.
We blame sexism.

 

 

 

FAQ

Webmaster

Peter Douglas Zohrab

Latest Update

12 November 2017

Top