The response scrawled on above questionnaire is another
example of "wimmin's language" (For
further information on the questionnaire, see the page: stupidty.html).
Looked at objectively, it is an incredibly stupid comment -- no hint
is given about why, or in what way, it is supposed to be "inappropriate".
But what is amazing is that men in New Zealand seems to take seriously
such female stupidity as this. Kiwi men are really very house-trained
I have noticed other examples of similar Feminist uses of this word:
An anonymous reviewer of an article
I submitted to a journal (who I think is an intellectually stupid
Lesbian Law lecturer) claimed that it was "inappropriate"
for me to state that Feminist research into Domestic Violence was
an abuse of trust, in an article where that
was the main point that I was making !
In a Law class, when I told a Feminist lecturer that her behaviour
in an incident she had just told us about (see the page: lawsecrt.html
) was incredible in its ethical implications, a Feminist student
tried to shut me up by saying that it was "inappropriate"
for me to say that.
In another Law class, when I was shouted down by some Feminazi
students for criticising affirmative action in the appointment of
judges to the International Criminal Court, the Feminazi lecturer,
Verena Murschetz, backed the Feminazis and told me that my comment
was "inappropriate". In the end, however, after a preliminary
argument about freedom of speech, I prevailed and was able to make
my point, . After the lecture, I went to talk to her, and she tried
unsuccessfully to avoid me. I told her that that place (the Faculty
of Law at Victoria University of Wellington) was the most Fascist
place I had ever been in.
It is important to note that this use of the
word "appropriate" is not just stupid and laughable -- it
is also totalitarian and oppressive. It relies on learned passivity
and acquiescence on the part of men in New Zealand -- and no doubt in
all other Western countries, as well.