(Open Letter to the Prime Minister)
Dear Mr. Key,
Equality Before the Law
I realise you don't know much about the Law,
but neither do most lawyers -- especially about Human Rights. For
example, you support the discriminatory, anti-male White Ribbon Campaign,
and I have seen a lawyer write that no judge in New Zealand would
rule that the White Ribbon Campaign was discriminatory. That may or
may not be true, but (if true) it only speaks to the intellectual
quality and anti-male bias of the judges. For example, in my Crimes
course at Law School, the head of the course, Elisabeth
McDonald, told us that she would be showing us law students a
video on Domestic Violence, but that we did not have to attend on
that day, because it would not be included in our course assessment.
So why was this lecturer using taxpayer-funding to show a video which
was so irrelevant to the course that it would not be examined?
I turned up on the day (which she had clearly hoped I would not
do) and found that it was an over-the-top, emotive, Feminist propaganda
video featuring an emergency call to the police by a woman and a talk
by a bull-dyke in black leather and crew-cut to a hall packed with
adoring women. Students coming straight from school are impressionable,
and think that university lecturers know a lot (which they usually
don't), so how can we expect our Ministers of Justice, lawyers and
judges to have an objective view of Domestic Violence (or anything)
after this sort of education?
She says in her preface to that the Government is committed to
"keeping victims safe, particularly women and children."
Women got the vote on the basis that they wanted "equality"
with men, and here we have a Femifascist Minister of Justice saying
that men are a lower priority, as far as being safe from family
violence is concerned. What happened to Equality
Before the Law? This anti-male sexism is a logical consequence
of your own Femifascist prioritisation of women over men in the
White Ribbon Campaign.
At the front of this document, there is an unexplained, full-page
photograph of a woman, which underlines the message that this minister
is just about women.
Since the above document refers to "strengthening"
what New Zealand already has in place, it has predetermined
that what we have in place is fine, and that all we need to do
is strengthen it. Therefore I will not be making any submission,
since what we already have in place is the product of Femifascist
The document claims that the Domestic Violence Act 1995 was "world-leading"
-- yet it also states "Clearly something isn't working."
What isn't working is the Domestic Violence Act 1995, which was
world-leading in irrational man-hatred. See my article The
Influence of Non-Legal Research on Legal Approaches to Ex Parte
Domestic Violence Protection Orders. As I showed
in my article Incompetence and Man-Hating
Victimisation of Men, women tend to be more fearful and
more emotional than men, and their power over the Justice System
and the Domestic Violence industry has turned these two institutions
into mere playthings of women's irrrationality.
On TV One on Sunday 2nd August 2015, I heard Amy Adams say that:
Most Domestic Violence is committed by men; and
Domestic Violence involves "control"
Amy Adams may or may not know something about the Law, but she clearly
knows nothing about Domestic Violence research. It is absolutely typical
for lawyers (in the Law Commission, for example) to go on a power
trip and make law change proposals, when they don't understand the
social phenomena that their laws are supposed to regulate. I have
already mentioned my article Incompetence
and Man-Hating Victimisation of Men , which proves that the
Ministry of Social Development is incompetent in this area, and it
was probably from that Ministry that Amy Adams obtained her belief
that most Domestic Violence is committed by men. in fact, men are
unlikely to report being victims of Domestic Violence to the Police
-- and they will become even less likely to report it, now that Amy
Adams has made it clear that 'the Government is committed to "keeping
victims safe, particularly women and children."' Men do and will
increasingly feel that they are second-class citizens, and that the
Police only exist to hep women. There is a huge mass of research which
proves that "women
are as physically aggressive, or more aggressive, than men in their
relationships with their spouses or male partners."
The notion that Domestic Violence often or always involves "control"
is pure man-hating fiction, originating in the "Duluth Model"
or "Power and Control Model", for which there has never
been any evidence. Amy Adams presumably also obtained this belief
Ministry of Social Development, who attempted
to DEFINE Domestic Violence as involving control, since they couldn't
PROVE that it was! The sheer stupidity of the relevant female
ministers and public servants is completely beyond belief! No wonder
Amy Adams refused to allow me to come and see her to discuss sexual
Freedom of Expression and Conflict of Interest
I seriously suggest to you that you abolish the news and current
affairs media, for the following reasons:
They only exist for women. I have been a Men's Rights Activist
(MRA) since 1987, speicalising in Domestic Violence issues, and
neither I nor any of my colleagues has ever been allowed to debate
relevant issues in the media with Feminists, so that the public
would be able to decide between the two sets of views.
They are undemocratically powerful. For example, you were forced
to give Syrian refugees preferential treatment over other refugees
because of the media coverage that they received.
Men have no freedom of expression in New Zealand, because media
propaganda reaches vastly more people with the same Feminist message
than Men's Rights Activists can reach with a contrary message.
The Broadcasting Act and Press Council provide no practical remedy
for persistent, perpetual anti-male bias in the media, as opposed
to one-off events.
The news and current affairs media have passed their use-by date,
since the Internet makes them unnecessary, to a large extent.
There are no conflict-of-interest laws that prevent the media
from mounting campaigns or being politically biased. For example,
after you announced your Cabinet, the TV One evening news mentioned
that one third of the Cabinet was female before even starting its
programme! The television channels push Feminist policies while
ignoring Masculist policies.
In other words, the country which you claim
to govern is in fact a Femifascist dictatorship, more or less.