No reason is given why New Zealand needed to be “in step”
with these particular countries;
It is ethnocentric or racist to assume that we need to be “in
step” with England, Canada and Australia, rather than (say) Singapore,
India, Brazil, Russia, Japan, Israel, Egypt, Nigeria, South Africa, etc.;
New Zealand is an ethnically diverse country and is not tied to England,
Canada and Australia by any umbilical cord;
Matters of psychological research, as they relate to the law, should
be decided on their merits, and not on the basis of what other countries
The phrase “in step” has militaristic, Fascist and anti-democratic
There is no legal basis for imposing an obligation on the legal system
of New Zealand to play a game of leap-frog with England, Canada and Australia,
whereby every Feminist law “reform” victory in one of those
countries must be matched in every other of the four (including New Zealand).
Therefore the Family Violence Death Review Committee and the Law Commission
are illegally imposing an autocratically invented principle upon the New
That proves the existence of a conspiracy.
The fact that it is a Feminazi conspiracy can be easily, but not quickly,
proved by pointing to the stinking, anti-male predetermination which oozes
from the Law Commission and the Family Violence Death Review Committee.
Since that takes time, it will not be done in this short letter.
You are not competent to oversee a project on so-called “Victims
of family violence who commit homicide”, because your educational
background is in law, and the fundamental issues here are scientific ones
relating to the nature of domestic violence.
It is typical of the law profession that it abuses its power and takes
decisions in areas where it is incompetent, and allows itself to be conned
by predetermined and unscientific conclusions emanating from ruthless