I have written elsewhere about the facts that:
See the following:
Feminists know nothing, and care less, about men's rights, interests or needs, so they have absolutely no idea what "equality" between men and women would even look like -- let alone aiming at achieving that equality.
In Male Politicians and Female Policies, I pointed out that increasing the proportion of female MPs in a parliamentary party does not result in a more equal distribution of policies between those that help men and those that help women. See the following table which is based on searches of New Zealand political party websites for the words "men" and "women" on October 22 2013:
Search for "women"
Search for "men"
146 hits (only 71% as many results as for "women")
5 pages of hits
3 pages of hits (only 60% as many results as for "women")
New Zealand First
7 pages of hits
3 pages of hits (only 42% as many results as for "women")
About 6,770 results
About 1,700 results (only 25% as many results as for "women")
As I stated on the page Male Politicians and Female Policies, the fact that the word "men" occurs does not necessarily imply that the relevant document is about men. It is likely that many of the documents are really about women, and just include men for the purposes of comparison. All these parties have more or less Feminist agendas, by which I mean that they are more or less conscious of a perceived need to increase the number of female Members of Parliament (MPs), but they have no apparent inclination to promote policies that benefit men, unless they also benefit women. You might think that, when/if parties equalise the number of male and female MPs or of male and female spokespeople, then they will finally turn their attention to balancing their pro-female policies with an equal number of pro-male policies.
Although my knowledge of mathematics is only elementary, it seems to me that the Z-Effect describes the above graph reasonably adequately.
Z-Effect: m = 100 - (((p-6)/2)x3), where
The Z-Effect predicts that the proportion of female MPs would have to be only 6% if we wanted to ensure that the word "men" appeared just as often as the word "women" on a party's website. It predicts that a party's having an equal number of male and female MPs would result in the word "men" being mentioned only 35% as often as the word "women" on the party's website. It also predicts that, if the number of female MPs reached 72% of one Parliamentary party, the word "men" would cease to be mentioned on the party's website altogether!
Feminism has nothing to do with equality! It is a power-grab by women for women!!