Home > Issues > Race > Maori Men are the Main Victims of the Feminist Divide-and-Rule Strategy |
||||||||||
|
Empowering Men:fighting feminist lies |
|||||||||
Maori Men are the Main Victims of the Feminist Divide-and-Rule StrategyPeter Zohrab 2020 |
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
(Open Letter to the Minister for Regional Economic Development)
Dear Mr. Jones,
I am writing to you in your capacity as the unofficial Minister for Maori Men.
As a generalisation, I would say that Maori men are less Feminist than Christian or Agnostic White men (apart from Catholics) and less Feminist than Jews (apart from Ultra-Orthodox Jews). When I was Secretary of the New Zealand Men for Equal Rights Association, our President, Mike Baird, was a Maori and I also had constructive correspondence with the former Speaker of Parliament (a Maori ), the late Sir Peter Tapsell.
In saying that Maori Men are the main victims of the Feminist Divide-and-Rule strategy, I mean that (in New Zealand) the Feminists have been trying to isolate Maori men from their Bros of other ethnic groups, so that they can selectively demonise Maori men and totally disempower them, mainly using the Domestic Violence Act (1995). I refer, for example, to a recent court case where a Maori woman got a mere slap on the wrist with a wet bus ticket as punishment for killing her male partner (Domestic violence trial: Abused woman Karen Anne Ruddelle not guilty of murder, but guilty of manslaughter (Domestic violence trial: Abused woman Karen Anne Ruddelle not guilty of murder, but guilty of manslaughter). I have had several personal experiences of the Police refusing to believe that females had assaulted me physically, and I have experienced unprovoked aggressive behaviour by Maori (as well as White) women -- some of which has been witnessed by other people or recorded by closed-circuit television cameras (see below).
Therefore I suspect that the Maori man who was killed had either reported his partner's violence to the Police and had not been believed, or did not report her violence because he was sure he would not be believed. I have also written about Police and Judicial anti-male double standards in my article about a Maori couple: Bias in the case: R v Danny Brian Mayes. Because the State does not generally support men against violent women, men are thrown back onto their own resources, which makes it easy for women to provoke and assault them -- and ultimately to kill them, without serious penalty. The Police can easily be manipulated into creating a record of Domestic Violence for a particular man, while ignoring the woman's violence. That then puts the woman in a position to kill the man, if she wants to, and she will then be treated by the courts as Karen Anne Ruddelle was. See also my article on a similar case: Court Falls for Old Philosophical Trick , where the same "psychologist", Dr Alison Towns, was the prime defence witness.
See also my previous open letter to you: Kiwi Males Beware: Somewhere Near You, Some Woman Is Having An Emotion!