It clearly implies that domestic violence is just something that men do
women, and treats it as a human rights issue. The real human rights issue
is that men's suffering from physical and psychological abuse by women is
ignored by Feminists, Amnesty International, the Police and the Law
Faculties of most universities. That is partly why I am now a Law student.
You will note from the above web page that murder by a woman of her husband
is treated as a RESULT of domestic violence by him -- whereas murders by men
of their wives are treated by Feminists as EXAMPLES of domestic violence.
In other words, every situation is interpreted in such a way as to fit the
male-perpetrator+female-victim model -- irrespective
of the facts. Men are
not socially or legally encouraged to complain about their wives, so their
suffering goes unheard.
On top of that, men are brainwashed by Anger Management courses to see
themselves as the cause of all problems, because of their so-called desire
to dominate women. In fact, this Feminist propaganda, with the support of
the legal system, is a way for women to dominate men.
Go to isdv.html for more information on this topic.
Tom Miller (USA):
You got all that right about their double standards, but you left out one
of my favorites. You pointed out that Amnesty International and gender-hostile
feminists teach men in anger management that it's all their fault, but you
left out the part about it being law and requirement for victim advocates
to teach/tell women that it's NEVER their fault they were abused, even though
the abuse is mutual half the time.
They quote to women the victim advocates' motto: "There's no excuse
for abuse!" (referring to abusive men only) while telling battered men
that they must have surely done something to her to deserve it. What happened
to "There's no excuse for abuse!" when it comes to abusive women???
They just don't get the contradiction they immerse themselves in by having
this quote only apply in favor of women. Of course you can't have a ridiculous
policy like this for only one side or the other, nor can it work for both
sides at the same time.
Victim (women) advocates have it in writing/policy that they must believe
a woman without question. Why? Well, how would it feel to be a victim and
not be believed? (Yet over 80% of women making abuse allegations connected
with DIVORCE cases are making false allegations) So, if there is to be no
double standard then shouldn't we also believe men unconditionally? What a
mess that would be also.
The local newspaper also printed this policy adopted by CAPSA (Citizens
Abuse Prevention Services Agency - the name of our local women's shelter and
victim advocate hub) that they always will believe and support women's accounts
of abuse. This policy is also adopted by other victim advocates, family and
child protective services, police, county attorney, etc. After all, "How
would it feel to be a victim and not be believed or even listened to?"
They'd be abused twice, right? At least REAL victims would be. Male victims
of domestic violence ARE abused twice, in this very way. These men often remark,
"The second beating is the worst." (The beating by victim advocates.)
This takes us back to the days of second class citizens, slavery and even
lower. What do they have against equality and stopping abuse for everyone?
The children get the worst of this crazy, backward, violent system: agencies
resembling a case of mass Borderline Personality Disorder - unstable, volatile,
violent, actors, impossible to please, chaotic, contradictory, bass-ackwards...
VAWA (Violence Against Women Act) gave billions of dollars for distribution
to victim advocate programs for women only. Our local subscriber is the CAPSA
Women's Shelter which now goes by the name of CAPSA "Family" Violence
Shelter since being challenged for only helping women. But they now occasionally
help a token male victim. To get a protective or restraining order you have
to go through CAPSA. They routinely turn men away because "men are not
victims" and besides "these men are just trying to obtain protective
orders to abuse, harass and control women even further." VAWA feminist
indoctrination includes the "fact" that women NEVER lie when reporting
Part of the requirement for getting VAWA funds is to not question women's
accounts of abuse. The reporting women must be told that it is never the woman's
fault that they were abused, no matter what, even if they attacked the man
or held a knife or gun on him or have a history of beating and otherwise abusing
him, and then he FINALLY strikes back, even mildly... "Funny" thing
is that these same "people" always question the male victims in
an accusing manner, asking him what he did to provoke the woman to hit, attack
or abuse him otherwise. He must have done something terribly wrong or she
just wouldn't "defend" herself like that.
Also, yesterday I went next door to A&W fast-food restaurant for a hamburger
to go. Two of our very own finest local Smithfield City (population 8000)
policemen were in line behind me. I asked them who among them responds to
DV (domestic violence) calls. The spokesman of the two said that they are
all trained, so whoever is on duty can and will respond. I asked if they were
familiar with the women's false abuse allegation epidemic here in our valley
and around the globe. They acted almost puzzled. I mentioned the recent case
of Anthony Migliori from Hyrum, a neighboring town, who was lucky enough to
be acquitted of false charges in court by his wife and daughter for child
molestation and raping his wife. This case was shown in court to be classic,
severe, textbook parental alienation dripping with false allegations and brainwashing
(severe abuse) by mother and CAPSA. Due to unshakable evidence the 4 man,
4 woman jury unanimously acquitted him of the charges, absolving him of a
potential life sentence. Was justice served? Before answering that, consider
that CAPSA still supports the liars and is still hostile toward the real victim,
a man. The county attorney refuses to press charges against the real abusers/liars
(women and victim advocates) and the judge refuses to asses perjury charges
despite the extensive abuse Mr. Migliori was put through, or that he spent
over $50,000 defending himself with an accompanying great expense of time,
energy and emotion. Justice? I then pointed out to the policemen that even
though CAPSA wholeheartedly backed the woman's and daughter's false allegations
as usual, the daughter of course was really another victim of her mother and
CAPSA also, who will go free because it doesn't cost to take a shot at men;
they're just slaves anyway. Mr. Migliori's daughter has suffered terrible
turmoil and has been out of control and wild for her mother too. She has needed
extensive help from counselors, who've unfortunately abused her additionally
by validating the lies and solidifying her brainwashing.
I asked what percentage of DV here in Smithfield was committed by each sex.
The spokesman said that CAPSA trains them, that well over 90% of DV is committed
by men (97% according to police arrest records, meaning that: "Abuse
of men by women and police is proof that men are bad, or - millions of Jewish
Holocaust victims are proof that Jews are bad..." I responded that hundreds
of studies confirm that this is not true at all, that DV goes both ways, and
with younger couples, women are actually more often the perpetrators, also
inflicting most of the DV injuries that need medical attention, which is shown
in extensive numbers of studies which are suppressed and reversed by abusive
women's groups/advocates. The policeman commented that they do get a lot of
disagreement between the parties involved in DV as to who is doing the abusing.
I told him that studies show that in half of the DV cases the violence is
going both ways and that in about a quarter of the cases it's the man, and
in the remaining quarter the woman is the exclusive abuser/perpetrator. I
asked how they handle it when the man and woman don't agree on who is doing
the abusing. He said they just send it to CAPSA and the judge and let THEM
work it out. (?!!!)
This on-the-spot interview confirms at least 6 points:
CAPSA is in control of all outcomes. CAPSA accomplishes this the same way
abusive women win by using false abuse allegations. They use emotional facts
and emotional reasoning (translated: propaganda and lies presented with intense
emotion and distress to convince officials and public that they should support
a justified agenda to abusively punish and control the falsely accused.
Police are hostile against men because of CAPSA/feminist propaganda. Police
are naive, sympathetic to "women who cry wolf" and willing to attack
men because of lies told about them - "just to be safe" in supporting
CAPSA, and agencies with the same agenda (defenders of the abused), have
seemingly undentable CREDIBILITY to the public and media despite their clearly
demonstrated lies, abuse and support of liars and female abusers.
Despite the fact that police are constantly being told by so many men that
the wife is the one abusing them, police ignore this and turn the matter over
to even worse abusers than their wives (CAPSA, judges and fellow travelers).
CAPSA is just like any other feminist women's shelter and women's support
network anywhere around the globe. The worst abusers are from victim advocate
agencies - institutionalized abuse - the ultimate abusers and predators.
Negative, abusive propaganda against men is firmly entrenched within government
Of course CAPSA trains the judges, teachers, clergy and others also, that
men bad and are perpetrators while women are good and are victims. So, CAPSA
in effect (as we've known all along) gets to judge and convict whom they deem
to be guilty (men of course) and they influence and control the judge (the
tail wagging the dog). Wow, that's nice! Training by the foxes on how the
farmer must send the chickens to foxes for help or for discipline. "Bad
chickens! You must have done something very wrong for the foxes to have been
so very upset as to try to eat you. You must be sacrificed to the foxes for
being so very, very bad!"
Comment by Peter Zohrab:
This is the kind of society that millions of men died
for in a war against Nazi Germany. Is this an improvement over Nazism ?