|
Submitted on 2021-05-27 05:14:18
Please tell us who you are
1 I am responding as:
Community member
2 Region:
Canterbury and Chatham Islands - Waitaha
3 My answers relate to the draft content for:
Both (English and Maori curriculums)
4 Ethnicity:
No ethnicity. I am not ethnocentric or racist like you.
5 Which iwi do you affiliate to?
N/A
Your views
6 I think the content reflects the stories our young people need
to know.
Strongly Disagree
Please comment:
It is politically biased and predetermines a certain moral conclusion.
It ignores the complexity of pre-European prehistory, starts with the
fiction of a single Maori people and concentrates on the
racist term "colonialism", as if that was substantially
different or worse than the various events which preceded it, over a
much longer period. So-called "Colonialism" was carried out
by Whites, and this term is used to create a moral case for Non-White
Supremacy (Marxism: "superstructure") to enable the subjugation
of Whites by Maoris, in temporary alliance with Pacific New Zealanders
and any others (e.g. Moslems) who they can drag into alliance with them.
It lies about the name of the country, which is "New Zealand"
-- not "Aotearoa New Zealand". Even if it were "Aotearoa
New Zealand", it would only be "Aotearoa New Zealand"
in English. In Maori, it would always just be "Aotearoa",
because Maoris are racist. You are quite right to say,
"Ideologies and beliefs, from within and beyond
Aotearoa New Zealand, underpin expressions of power and resistance
and insisting on rights and identity."
However, the draft curriculum itself constitutes an ideology and
beliefs which express the power of Maoris within the media, the education
system, the public service and the Labour Party. This is a Maori-centric
curriculum, which is totally inappropriate in a democracy. Maoris don't
understand democracy, since they didn't have it before the Whites came.
This is a divisive, anti-democratic document, which will lead to civil
war -- i.e. to the pre-White state of affairs, where might was right
and slavery and violence ruled the roost. It is an arrogant document,
written by stupid people who think that they know better than others.
7 I think the content will encourage more diverse local stories to
be acknowledged and learnt by young people in school and kura.
Agree
8 I believe the content reflects our bicultural history as a nation.
Strongly Disagree
Please comment:
That is a lie. Unfortunately, women have been let out of the kitchen
and are busy telling lies everywhere they go. Women don't have enough
testosterone,
which has been proven to reduce lying. The draft curriculum appears
to avoid mentioning the Treaty of Waitangi, which does not mention culture.
Britain was already multicultural when the treaty was signed, so the
treaty was not a bicultural document. We do not have a bicultural history.
We have a multicultural history. Even the Maoris were multicultural,
before the contrast with the Whites made them appear to be monolithic
"Maoris".
Your views - continued
9 I am most interested in young people learning and developing:
Please select up to three drop-down options:
Awareness of the differing local regional and national Maori histories
I am most interested in young people learning and developing::
A greater interest in history
I am most interested in young people learning and developing:
A range of interesting and relevant topics
10 I think the greatest challenge(s) will be:
Please select up to three drop-down options:
Managing teacher biases on different historical accounts
I think the greatest challenge(s) will be:
Teacher and kaiako lack of in-depth history knowledge
I think the greatest challenge(s) will be:
Coverage of iwi stories, where there are many iwi connected to an
area
Please comment:
As the saying goes, the victors write the history books. The Maoris
have conquered Wellington and the Labour Party, so now the Maoris are
writing the history curriculum. Similarly, iwis and hapus who have possession
of their lands by virtue of the genocide which their ancestors perpetrated
on the previous inhabitants are not likely to admit (or even remember)
what actually happened. So our kids will be taught fake history, which
is one reason why New Zealand history should not be taught in schools.
11 Some Aotearoa New Zealand historical events are more important
to me than others: (Select all that you would like to provide feedback
on, and comment as selected) National History, Regional History, Local
History, Iwi History
National History:
Regional History:
Local History:
Iwi History:
12 Other comments on this work that I would like to share are:
(For example, please note if this response is on behalf of a group):
This curriculum is an exercise in Maori colonisation
of the rest of the population.
See also:
|
