I have been known to write negatively about Lesbian
Feminists. This shocks
people. Why do I attack Lesbians? Let's
ask a different set of questions: why not attack
Lesbians, and why does it shock people ?
Are you horrified when Lesbian Feminists criticise
men ? Of course not -- whole areas of Western legislation
are the embodiment of Lesbian Feminist hatred of men. The United States even
took complete leave of its senses and passed into law a "Violence Against
Women" Act, and the fact that you probably don't see anything insane
about that shows how you have been captured and subjugated by Lesbian Feminist
criticisms of men -- yet you won't allow me to criticise Lesbians ?
Elizabeth Meehan (1990 "British Feminism from the 1960s to the 1980s", in
Harold Smith (ed.)(1990): "British Feminism in the Twentieth Century", University
of Massachusetts Press, pp. 191-2), referring to Radical Feminists, states
that "Radicals demand that lesbianism be
considered not merely a matter of freedom of choice but as essential political
practice for feminists."
Have a look at these two webpages:
What is a university doing publicising Lesbian hatred of men ? Answer:
Doing what universities usually do -- promoting man-hatred.
Violence Bibliography Why does the US Government have a "Violence
Against Women" Act, when female violence against males is at least
as common as male violence against women ? Does the US Congress hate men
? Answer: Yes.
The MUC (Media-University Complex)
I know your problem: you have committed at least one of the following three
You have been to a university or college;
You have read a newspaper or magazine;
You have watched a TV news or current affairs programme, or listened
to one on the radio.
The MUC (Media-University Complex) have taught you
to think like them.
The MUC divide the World into Good Guys and Bad Guys (It's good that you
can now use "guys" to refer to females, because most of the "Good
Guys" are women). Religions and Ideologies are also famous for dividing
the World into Good Guys and Bad Guys. This is not a coincidence, since the
MUC have their own ideology as well (which you have learned).
Victims as Oppressors
According to this ideology, Lesbians are oppressed by Homophobia and Homophobes.
So far so good. That is obviously true. It's what happens next that's the
Being deemed "oppressed", Lesbians are designated "Good
Guys", and this gives them huge power;
Lesbians also oppress people (given half a chance) -- specifically,
they oppress men;
If you attack Good Guys, you are deemed to be oppressing them, so you
can't criticise Lesbians.
Since World War Two, Western Ideology has adopted the Jews as a political
prototype, so let's compare the Lesbians with the Jews. In various countries,
the Jews have been deemed to be oppressed -- culminating in the Nazi genocide
of Jews during the 1930's and 1940's. But now the Jews in Israel are deemed
to be oppressing the Palestinians.
An oppressed group is a potential oppressor, waiting
to be given the chance. As the "False Prophet" said, "There's no
use in exalting the humble and the meek. They don't remain humble and meek
once they're exalted".
Why Lesbians ?
Even if you agree with all the above, you may doubt
that Lesbians are the problem -- rather than Feminists in general. This would
take a very lengthy article (or a whole book) to demonstrate conclusively,
but have a look at these links:
Here are some additional points, based on my observations and experience:
The Anti-(Male)-Violence industry (Women's Refuges, "Rape Crisis"
organisations, legal research and lobbying, Sex-Abuse lobby groups, etc.)
has provided a career-niche for Lesbians, who are very prominent in this
area. You may argue that Lesbians are discriminated against in other areas,
but this is one area where being Lesbian is a definite plus;
In the workplace, I have found that Lesbians attract a group of defensive
friends, who attack pro-men men in nasty ways, rather than merely defending
Lesbians against potential (possibly non-existent) threats;
Lesbians are the backbone of the Feminist Movement -- they try to prevent
backsliding by Feminists who may actually like men and might be inclined
to want them to have some rights. Lesbians do not "sleep with the
enemy", and so they are free to be as anti-male as they like.
I once showed the Department of Justice report Hitting Home: Men
Speak about Abuse of Women Partners to Michael Bott -- then a fellow
Men's Rights activist, now a lawyer. This activist pointed, one after
another, to three or four of the persons featured on the acknowledgement
pages and said, "She's a Lesbian, she's a Lesbian, she's a Lesbian
...." (This report, incidentally, was supposed to have been followed
by one on women's abuse of male partners and another on same-sex partners'
abuse of each other, but these never eventuated, in keeping with the Feminist
emphasis on restricting the "bad guy" label to men).
If you are a man who is happy to let the Feminists
reduce everyone except adult women to the status of slaves, then I have nothing
to say to you. If -- on the other hand -- you agree that men have to fight
for their rights (like anyone else in a pressure-group society), then you
would be stupid to fight with one arm tied behind your back. If you let Lesbians
attack men but refrain from attacking Lesbians yourself, you are fighting
with one hand behind your back.